Planned Parenthood’s Pure Evil

If you are looking for examples of pure evil in our society, look no farther than Planned Parenthood. What could be more evil than killing innocent children in the womb and then selling the body parts for profit? It’s not wise to invoke the Hitler comparison too often as it should be used only for the most vile practices. In this case, however, the comparison is appropriate.

So when an undercover camera crew entices Planned Parenthood officials to admit to their horrific practices, and we are given undeniable proof of their depravity, what comes of it? The major news networks do their best to ignore the videos and the organization that carries out the exposé, the Center for Medical Progress, is the one having to pay the legal penalty. That’s what has happened in Harris County, Texas, which includes the city of Houston.

Judicial Target Range

The county’s investigation of the videos led to no indictments for Planned Parenthood officials; instead, the prosecutors decided to indict those who made the perfidy of Planned Parenthood public.

David DaleidenDaniel Daleiden, from the Center for Medical Progress, now faces charges for using a fake driver’s license and attempting to solicit the purchase of baby parts.

I understand the legal issue of using a fake driver’s license, and perhaps he ought to answer for that, but let’s keep some things in perspective here. What is worse, using a fake license to uncover the horrid truth about Planned Parenthood or the horrid truth itself?

And being indicted for soliciting the purchase of body parts? Does anyone really think Daleiden was actually going to do so? Why was he singled out and not the organization that does the selling?

Daleiden says he will not do any kind of plea bargain. He believes he should be exonerated for bringing to light the true nature of Planned Parenthood. I agree. The next investigation needs to be of the Harris County prosecutor’s office.

Planned Parenthood is a blight on America. Not only does its flow of federal funding need to be stopped immediately, but steps should be taken to shut down every Planned Parenthood facility in the country. That would be the first step in atoning for the atrocity of abortion that we continue to allow.

Obama & the Constitution . . . Again

Tonight is President Obama’s final State of the Union Address. Finally.

I expect the viewing audience will be comprised of his eager followers and those who are political junkies only. I won’t be one of them. That may surprise some of you who think I live and breathe politics. I don’t. I love the Biblical approach to governing but am just as turned off by politics-as-usual as the majority of our citizens.

I have a deep devotion to the rule of law and the Constitution that established it in our nation. That’s one reason why I have ceased being interested in what our president has to say—he has no such respect for those concepts:

Kind of an Expert

He never tires of reminding us that he taught constitutional law. Unfortunately, teaching constitutional law is no indication that the teacher has any knowledge of how it is supposed to work. Well, perhaps he does know how it’s supposed to work; he just doesn’t like that approach. He’s far more comfortable being a law unto himself:

Shot Constitution

Why bother with that document when one has, as he has stated, a different way of governing?

Assaul Weapon

His latest foray into government-by-executive-only is his attempt to curb the Second Amendment, Constitution notwithstanding:

Ain't Big Enough

He has a different worldview, to say the least:

Kind of Suspicious

Why is he so concerned about guns? Watch his tears and you will be informed that it stems from a deep, abiding love for the safety of children:

Never Mind

Right. And that’s another reason why I won’t be wasting my time this evening watching the State of the Union Address. I will see plenty of excerpts later; meanwhile, I can use my time far more productively.

Principle & Compromise: Not Always at Odds

I’ve called this blog Pondering Principles because I’m dedicated to laying a principled foundation for whatever subject I scrutinize. I also want to see principles—Biblical principles—become the basis for all public policy. Those of us oriented toward principles have a natural aversion to compromise; we have a tendency to see all compromise as a step backward. I would like to argue that is not the case.

Let’s start historically and work our way to present-day issues.

At the Constitutional Convention, a major disagreement erupted between states with lesser populations and those with greater. The less-populated states desired representation in the Congress to be based on equality; they wanted an equal vote for all states. Their concern was they would be outvoted on everything if population became the cornerstone of representation. Larger states naturally felt the opposite: since they had the most people, they should have a greater say in legislation. Who was correct? I think both had valid points. Their concerns were genuine and needed to be addressed. The convention came up with a compromise that divided the Congress into two houses, one based on population, the other on equality.

That is an example of an excellent compromise because it didn’t sacrifice principle on either side. Without that compromise, there would have been no Constitution. The nation might have split into three or four warring factions, with all the misery that would have been connected with such a division.

Then there’s the example of New York state during the governorship of John Jay at the turn of the nineteenth century. Jay, an evangelical Christian, had often worked for the abolition of slavery in his state. Now, as governor, he had the opportunity to sign into law a gradual emancipation bill. This bill did not free all slaves immediately; rather, it laid out a plan that would eventually eliminate slavery in the next generation. As someone who believed slavery was contrary to God’s purposes, should Jay have signed such a bill? He had no hesitation in doing so. Why? Because it set slavery on the course of extinction in New York. Long before the Civil War decided that issue nationally, New York had resolved it gradually.

Was Jay disobeying God in signing that bill? I believe just the opposite. His was a principled position. The compromise of gradual abolition achieved the long-term goal of his principle—getting rid of slavery once and for all. The new law made a step in the right direction. Therefore, I consider his action to have been consistent with his principles. Not to have signed it meant the perpetuation of the slavery institution, not its demise.

Now let’s bring this up to date. Let me offer two more examples.

First, let’s look at the issue of abortion. I firmly believe that the taking of an innocent human life is immoral. It is opposed to God’s moral law. My principled position is that all abortions should be outlawed. What if, as a legislator, I were faced with a decision on a particular bill that would eliminate 95% of all abortions in America? Should I vote for it? If I were president, should I sign it into law?

There are some who would say no. Why? They consider it a compromise of principle. Any law that doesn’t eliminate all abortions is less than what God requires. Consequently, support for a proposed law that would take care of “only” 95% of them would be a sin.

Again, I disagree—vehemently. If I have the opportunity to save 95% [or even 50% or 10%] of all babies who would otherwise have their lives snuffed out arbitrarily, I must take that opportunity. I would be advancing the principle in which I believe. By supporting such a measure, I am moving my society closer to God’s purposes. If we take an all-or-nothing approach, I believe we are deceiving ourselves in believing we are standing on principle. I would call it stubborn foolishness instead.

Congress is going to be dealing with raising the debt ceiling again soon. I am opposed to doing so. I am opposed to raising taxes in any way that will harm those who provide jobs for others. I wholeheartedly seek spending cuts. Now, do I hold out for everything I want or is there a way to advance what I believe is principled even while compromising temporarily?

One thing that all principled conservatives have to recognize is that in politics you don’t always get everything you want immediately. We can, though, push for as much as may be possible.

If an agreement is reached, for instance, that raises the debt ceiling, yet also includes “real” spending cuts, a cap on future spending, no increase in taxes, and at least a vote on a balanced budget amendment, why would I not support this? Enacting measures like these would lead us further on the path toward a principled and sane tax-and-spend framework.

Here’s how I summarize it: a compromised principle leads to unrighteousness, but a principled compromise is a step closer to the principle’s ideal.

I wish I could convince everyone of the wisdom of this perspective, but I’ll settle for whoever has ears to hear.

Helping the Poor the Biblical Way

Even in an age that denigrates Christian faith when it comes to basic morality, we have politicians (and others) who fall back on it for whatever expansion of government they want to see.

The whole Religious Left is like this. They point to Scriptures that tell us to help the poor and disadvantaged, but with a twist—we are to use the power of government to carry out Jesus’ commands.

The problem becomes more complex when it shows up in those who claim to be conservatives. Take Ohio governor John Kasich, for example. As he runs for president, he hits conservatives over the head with his version of the Bible:

Medicaid Expansion

The Biblical admonitions to help the poor are real; the method whereby that should happen are real as well. In every case, the command is to individuals, as God wants to work on our hearts. And in the Old Testament, it is clear that the poor are not to receive mere handouts, but they are to do some work toward what they receive. We’re told when we reap the harvest of our field, we are to leave the corners for the poor so they can come in and glean for themselves.

That’s the principle.

Yet today we’ve set up a system that mechanically hands out checks without any regard to the character of those who get the checks. The government is a huge dispenser of funds that people, over time, become accustomed to receiving, and if the dispenser slows down at all, they become enraged.

We have created a culture of dependency, which is the opposite of what God wants to develop in the hearts of both givers and recipients.

Those on the Religious Left are doing a disservice to the Gospel with their constant demands for more government aid. They are helping lead people away from the Truth and are erecting an idol of government power.

You know what else I see? Sometimes, those who yell the loudest at conservatives for being hardhearted toward the poor are hardhearted themselves toward the most deserving of our care—those innocent children in the womb. They rail on about helping the poor, yet turn a blind eye and a deaf ear toward the atrocity of abortion.

Take the log out of your own eyes, please. Not only will you then see who deserves help, but, hopefully, the best way to offer that help. The true Christian spirit is that of giving from the heart, not depending on a government bureaucracy.

The Atrocity Known as Planned Parenthood

The House Judiciary Committee is holding another Planned Parenthood hearing today. This one will focus on the details of abortion procedures, with much of the attention on late-term abortions, as well as a medical analysis of the ramifications of altering abortion techniques to acquire intact, usable organs.

Cecile RichardsAt its last hearing, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards was grilled on the ghastly practices of her organization and the way in which taxpayer money has been spent on those practices, along with the exorbitant salary she receives for being the public face for Planned Parenthood’s selling of body parts of aborted infants.

Richards claimed that she had never heard of any baby being born alive during an abortion. If that’s never happened, why did Barack Obama, as an Illinois state senator, fight against a bill that would have provided medical care to children who “accidentally” showed signs of life after an abortion? Why fight against something that never happens?

She also had to admit, under this public scrutiny, that the oft-repeated claim that Planned Parenthood performs valuable services such as mammograms just isn’t true. One might ask why the mainstream media hasn’t picked up on that whopper, but there’s no need to ask—the mainstream media supports Planned Parenthood, being ideologically joined at the hip.

Democrats have pushed the lie that the videos showing the gruesomeness of abortion procedures and the callousness of conscience that allows for selling those body parts were “doctored.”

Videos

Bottom line: they aren’t interested in the truth.

Life is a sacred gift of God. We need to treat life with the greatest of respect. We’ve already seared our national conscience on abortion. Where are we headed next as a society?

Planned Elderhood

Don’t think this couldn’t happen. I applaud all those who are taking a firm, principled stand for life. May their efforts roll back this tide of depravity.

A Historian’s Perspective on Bad Times in American History

I don’t think there’s really any disagreement about how pessimistic the majority of Americans are about the future. Currently, all the polls reveal that pessimism.  As I survey the scene—the spiritual/moral, political, and cultural aspects [what does that leave?]—I have grave concerns as well. I’d like to offer a historian’s perspective.

Since I teach American history, I have a more in-depth knowledge of what has transpired previously. I can imagine myself transported back into earlier eras and think about how I might have felt about current events at those times. Bad moral climates, disunity, and devastating government policies have cropped up throughout our history.

If my life had spanned the late colonial and revolutionary era, for instance, I would probably have been quite distressed over the state of affairs. The colonies had declared independence, and it was a thrilling prospect, but the progress of the war was anything but thrilling.

George Washington was often near despair over the inability of the Congress to pay his troops or provide for their needs. Thousands deserted during events such as Valley Forge. There was talk of meekly bowing to the British because all hopes for the future now appeared to be delusional. Even after achieving independence, the new states didn’t seem to want to work together; the entire national governmental structure was on the verge of collapse.

If I had experienced the 1790s, I would have been shocked by the vitriol that spewed forth daily in some of the newspapers, particularly those that accused Washington of wanting to set himself up as king. The French Revolution, which took place at that time, was one of the bloodiest episodes in all of history, and many in America were hailing it as a magnificent development. I would begin to question the wisdom of the electorate and wonder if this fledgling country could survive its first decade after the Constitution.

Later, during the War of 1812, our military defenses were so disorganized that the British actually burned Washington, DC, including the president’s house and the Capitol. Their troops were ravaging the countryside, destroying everything in their path without any effective countermeasures. What a low point for a nation.

Then there’s the Civil War and the decade that led to it. Passions were so heated in Congress that representatives started bringing their weapons with them into the House and Senate for protection. Slavery, by this time, had become entrenched. The Founding Fathers had hoped to eliminate it, but now the South was proclaiming it to be a positive good from God.

The nation split; more than 620,000 died in the war that followed, the highest tally for any American war. Bitterness remained for years afterward [you can still see its remnants today].

The Progressive Movement, after the turn of the twentieth century, introduced more government involvement in people’s lives and decided that the Constitution was an outdated document that had to be reinterpreted. Woodrow Wilson, a racist and a eugenicist, took the presidency. The eugenics movement sought to limit who could have children; only the “best” should reproduce. This movement formed the cornerstone of Nazi policies in Germany later.

Wilson moved the country down the path that led to Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal in the 1930s—the fulfillment of progressive dreams as the government took charge of getting the nation out of the Great Depression. FDR’s policies were so dismally foolish that the Depression continued until WWII. If I had lived during those decades, I would have mourned the loss of Biblical principles and constitutional limitations. The reigning ideology tossed out the concept of the rule of law. Now, anything could happen.

I did live during the 1960s and 1970s. It was not pleasant. First was LBJ’s Great Society, which could be described as the New Deal on steroids, followed by the rancor of the Vietnam War, then Nixon’s Watergate fiasco, and finally, the debilitated presidencies of Ford and Carter. The economy was in the tank, the worst since the Great Depression. Along the way, we also concluded that innocent children in the womb could be murdered.

I say all of this to make this point: there have always been bad times. Quite often, those who believe in Biblical morality and constitutionalism have come to the edge of despair. Yet we are still here. There is still hope to turn things around. We survived the disunity of the Revolution and the Civil War. We overcame the disgrace of the burning of the nation’s capital. Calvin Coolidge reversed Woodrow Wilson’s policies and Jimmy Carter brought forth Ronald Reagan.

Will the disaster that is the Obama administration become a footnote in our history that will bring forth another resurgence of sanity, or have we turned a corner and lost our way forever? That page in our history has yet to be written. We are the ones who will write it. If we take our responsibility seriously, hope remains.

Exposing Planned Parenthood’s Evil Deeds

PP ProtestLast Saturday, people nationwide stood outside Planned Parenthood centers to protest this organization’s abominable practices. The protest was not only about defunding but about the seared conscience our country has developed about abortion itself. The bottom line is that abortion is murder, and it must be stopped.

The utter callousness of the abortion industry—and “industry” is the correct term—must be exposed for what it is. Most of the national news media is not going to help get out this message. An informal censorship on the issue has dominated; anyone not already informed and depending on the major networks to be informed will learn virtually nothing about what is happening.

Oh, but we’re very informed about trivial matters:

Sister Planet

Evil tries to disguise itself. Planned Parenthood has a history of deception. The only way to battle this deception is with an assault of truth.

Has a Heart

The pro-life message has been making inroads in our culture, despite the degenerate drift in our society. Now is not the time to give up. Now is the time to shine even more light on the evil deeds of darkness.