Beware the “Fairness” Argument

The world runs on the Internet, so of course President Obama resents the fact that he doesn’t have control over it. He has a bright idea. Let’s put the government in charge of how it is being used. You know—to be fair.

Whenever you hear a Democrat talk about “fairness,” beware. Remember the old Fairness Doctrine that was the law of the land for radio and television broadcasting? Its real purpose was to stifle opposition viewpoints. Fortunately, it was overturned, although the Progressive Dream is to see it reinstated so they can rein in popular commentators like Rush Limbaugh.

What they once did to broadcasting, they now want to do with the Internet. Don’t worry. We’re the impartial, helpful federal government making things “fair” for you. Although that will entail new rules, you understand.

Trust Us

Why, you’ll hardly notice the difference, and you’ll feel so safe:

Net Neutrality Program

We’re always assured it’s for the best. There are real questions, though, as to how easy it will be to enforce the rules:

Internet Freedom

We should keep in mind one rule that should always be in effect:

Not Broken

If you love Obamacare, you will love this misnamed Net Neutrality.

Identifying the Truly Stupid Voters

I think we’re now at six videos of Jonathan Gruber talking about the stupidity of the American voter and how to pull the wool over their eyes . . . and counting.

Apparently, Prof. Gruber is not a shy individual; he has been broadcasting his views about pulling a fast one with Obamacare for a number of years. So why are we only now hearing about this, when so many videos are available to view? Might it have something to do with the media blackout on the dysfunctional nature of the misnamed Affordable Care Act?

Melissa FrancisMelissa Francis, formerly of CNBC, and now with Fox Business Network, has come forward to tell her tale. She says when Obamacare was being pushed she ran the numbers on it and saw just how phony it all was—it couldn’t really work. She started talking about that on the air—it’s called real reporting—but then was taken to the woodshed by her superiors, who told her that her critique of Obamacare was “disrespecting the office of the presidency.” She had to curtail her honest reporting from that time on. Fortunately for her, she’s now at a network where she can tell the truth to the American people.

Meanwhile, our president, who has a superb track record of throwing people under the bus—Bill Ayers was just someone in his neighborhood; Jeremiah Wright was like the crazy uncle and he never heard him say such things in the twenty years he sat under his teaching—has now tossed Prof. Gruber under the same vehicle.

When questioned about Gruber, the Obama response was one that anyone who has paid any attention to him over the past six years could have guessed ahead of time. You see, he just found out about all this controversy, he hardly even knew Gruber (just by name as he sat around a table with many others), and he was “some adviser” who wasn’t on the president’s staff.

Goodbye, Mr. Gruber, it was nice not really knowing you all that well:

Professor Friend

Ignore, of course, that Gruber was paid nearly $6 million in taxpayer money to be merely “some adviser.” Don’t mention that he was “on loan” at one point by the White House to Congress to spread his wisdom there also. No, don’t pay any attention to those distractions; just believe whatever we tell you:

I'm with Stupid

Yes, many voters were fooled, but they were lied to repeatedly and wanted to trust their governmental leaders. That’s not the same thing as being stupid. If we truly want to tag that label on any voters, how about the ones who didn’t find any problem voting for a law they hadn’t read?

Critical

Now, there is the prime example of outright stupidity. Keep in mind that not even one Republican signed on to this monstrosity. This wasn’t bipartisan stupidity; it’s “owned” by one party only.

God Save Us

It is now confirmed that another American has been beheaded by ISIS. Peter Kassig, a former Army Ranger who then became an aid worker in Syria, is the latest Westerner to die trying to help people in dire need.

ISIS then released a statement saying that it intends to bring the war to the streets of America. Is it an idle threat? Not in their minds. And if we dismiss it as fantasy, we will regret that cavalier response.

Too many of us continue to live in our own personal fantasy about the Islamic worldview and its hostility toward those who are considered infidels. Sadly, that personal fantasy extends into the White House, which still calls the massacre at Ft. Hood an example of “workplace violence.”

The progressive elite, from Obama on down, have never come to grips with reality on the crucial issue of stopping terrorism—from their policy of open borders without constraint to the tepid response to ISIS.

One cartoonist has captured this bizarre worldview quite accurately:

Terrorist Community

Relationship Issues

Bigot

Romantic Troubles

God save us from the experts. God save us from our current rulers, who think citizens devoted to the Constitution are a bigger threat to the nation than those who are out to kill us. “God save us” is not a cliché, but an earnest and honest prayer.

The Obamacare Polygraph

A couple days ago I wrote about MIT professor Jonathan Gruber’s arrogant comments about how he helped construct and pass Obamacare, noting that he and others “in the know” deliberately muddled the language of the law to help it pass. The most infamous part of his comments was his putdown of American voters as stupid.

Gruber then went on MSNBC (where he was assured of a friendly hearing) to say he was speaking “off the cuff,” so we shouldn’t take his words seriously. However, shortly after that, because someone was doing some actual investigative reporting, two more videos of Gruber saying nearly identical things surfaced.

If you haven’t heard much about any of this, it’s because you watch network news, which has ignored the story entirely. Yet this is major. It strips away all the pretense about Obamacare and reveals the underhanded way in which it was developed and promoted. In short, it’s all a pack of lies.

Polygraph

This revelation, of course, is hardly a revelation to those of us who have perceived its faulty foundation from the start, and have warned that it’s a huge Ponzi scheme dedicated to the ultimate goal of placing all healthcare in the hands of the government.

The Obama administration has said virtually nothing about this. I imagine the president, if pressed on his need to respond, might have this attitude:

What Do They Know

The sad thing is that he’s probably correct, at least in the case of a certain segment of voters:

Some of the People

Gruber’s attempt to obfuscate in the language of the law helped win the day—along with the usual political shenanigans at the time that assured its passage. Anyone remember the Louisiana Purchase of Sen. Mary Landrieu?

Ironically, the law is heading back to the Supreme Court, with a case that focuses on some of its wording about how only the state exchanges can receive federal subsidies, not the exchanges set up by the federal government. Fewer than twenty states set up exchanges (some of which were complete fiascoes), so all those subsidies being handed out to the other states should be ruled illegal by the Court, if it follows the wording of the law itself.

Stupid Voters

Figuring out the precise wording, though, may be tricky, thanks to Prof. Gruber.

About Those Election Results

I was going to move on from the election results today. I really was. But I just can’t. I blame the political cartoonists; they’re doing some of their best work right now, and I would hate to let it go to waste. Let’s see how they’re handling this GOP victory and corresponding Democrat defeat.

What makes the victory even more compelling is that the media remained solid in support of the president and his minions. Yet the people pushed aside that heavy influence in their favor and voted against them anyway. It appears the strategy didn’t work:

Low Information

Democrats are fond of calling conservatives “deniers” when it comes to issues such as global warming [which isn’t exactly happening, so I guess I’m a “denier”], but they are becoming experts at real denial themselves:

Upset with Republicans

As for the president, he’s acting as if this whole election thing is no big deal:

Cavalier

He’s also claiming that he “hears” those who didn’t vote, implying they are all on his side. That’s an amazing trick:

Hearing Voices

Ocean of People

Obama is unbowed by the results. His approach is as in-your-face as ever:

Give & Take

Toast

And after accusing Republicans of every kind of evil and stalling all legislation in the Senate for years, we’re suppose to believe this election is a call for Republicans to be more conciliatory toward Democrats and be bipartisan [translation: you do what we want even though you won and we lost]?

Work Together

Let me be clear—to quote nearly all politicians—I believe in reconciliation and in principled compromises that advance good policies, and Republicans shouldn’t have a chip on their shoulders and refuse to work with Democrats. But keep in mind that goes both ways.

Acquiescence to intransigence on the Democrat side—insistence to continue their failed policies—would be to repudiate the results of this election, and Republicans must not go there. They must be principled and lead accordingly.

Their ideas may continue to be rejected by President Obama, and he may veto everything they try to do, but if he does, the American public will receive an overdue education that should lead to another Republican victory in 2016.

The Obamacare Deception

Jonathan GruberJonathan Gruber. Ever heard of him? He’s now infamous, at least for those who are paying attention to the latest Obamacare development. Gruber is an MIT health economist who was one of the key architects of Obamacare. A video has surfaced from 2013 where he is on a panel discussing the passage of that law. His comments are eye-opening.

First of all, he admits the bill “was written in a tortured way to make sure [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes.” So, it was a tax, but the wording was so convoluted that it would be hard to figure that out. Understand, this is not Gruber bemoaning that fact, but trumpeting it as a “win.”

He continued by saying that the goal was to hide the truth from the American people: “If you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed.”

Well, he’s right about that. But, as Nancy Pelosi, one of the self-proclaimed brilliant minds of the Congress, informed us back then, we needed to pass this bill so we could find out what is in it. Right. That’s how all bills should be passed—vote first, read it later.

Gruber wasn’t done. He then got to the bottom line: “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical for the thing to pass.”

Obamacare LogoThere you have it. The people who designed Obamacare, and those who promoted it, essentially relied upon Americans’ stupidity to make it law. There’s the demeaning aspect of Gruber’s comment—how he and others in this administration view the American public—but there’s also the element of truth in his analysis: the American people can sometimes be terribly stupid and go along with policies intended to destroy them.

Gruber concluded those comments with this: “Look, I wish … we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”

Let me translate: “The ends justify the means.”

Why would Gruber be so open about this? Did he think this would go unnoticed because the American people are so stupid? Is it simply the hubris of the arrogant class that knows what is good for the rest of us and will impose it upon us without our consent?

Regardless, the most transparent administration in history—in theory, not in reality—has just had a bright light shined on its deceptive practices. This is not an isolated incident; it’s the modus operandi for this White House in all things. Think Benghazi, the IRS, the DOJ, the NSA.

If you have been an Obama supporter in any fashion, you have aided in this deception. It’s time to wake up to the truth.

Now, will the mainstream media mention this or will they once again feign ignorance or declare it’s a non-story?

If you want to view this video, I hope you can. According to the account I read, though, it was pulled off YouTube yesterday after the initial furor. The coverup begins.

Have We Learned Our Lesson?

Let’s continue to talk about the ramifications of last week’s elections. Why? Because it’s a relief to finally have something positive to say about politics in our country. Most people understand what those elections meant. I say “most” because there are some who still just don’t get it:

When It Doesn't

The hypocrisy and self-serving nature of Obama’s response is pretty blatant. At his now-infamous press conference the day after the elections, he revealed that he isn’t changing his views on anything. And he tried the same old tired lines about how reasonable he is and how he’s oh-so-willing to work with Republicans. Well, he’s said that for six years and never followed through. The evidence?

Harry's Desk

Every time Republicans in the House sent a bill to the Senate for debate, it disappeared into a Harry Reid black hole, never to be seen again. Everyone knows this was done at President Obama’s direction. He never sought to have an honest debate about any issue and continued to say Republicans had no ideas, when, in fact, they had been brimming with ideas backed up by legislation.

His now widely ridiculed remark about how he “hears” the 2/3 who didn’t vote—more, apparently, than those who truly cared to vote and who sent the real message—again reveals his inner Barack, the One who believes the people who “really” count are all for him. The actual voters? Not so much.

I Hear You

Commentator Jonah Goldberg has some salient points to make about the one-note Obama presence at this news conference:

But as Obama droned on and on in that press conference on Wednesday, it felt like a horrible realization was washing over the Johnny Bravo Fan Club [the White House press corps]: Obama’s grown stale. Johnny Bravo has a shelf-life. There was Obama prattling on and on about how he had a mandate, he heard the voice of the non-voters, the GOP has an obligation to do what he wants, he did nothing wrong, blah blah blah. It was all so tone deaf and otherworldly and—most of all—it was so unfathomably boring. As I joked on Twitter, he could have seamlessly segued into reading the instructions for how to change the toner cartridge on a Xerox machine and the audience might not have noticed.

Maybe I’m wrong. But it kind of feels like Obama is a karaoke singer who doesn’t realize someone unplugged the machine. He’s out their belting out his golden oldies and no one is tapping their toes any more.

Thomas Sowell, the black conservative commentator and scholar, also has weighed in on the meaninglessness of Obama’s reign and offers a warning for those who were fooled by him and his promises. If you were fooled once, why would you fall for a second false scenario?

Sowell Quote

The all-important 2016 election now looms large. Have we learned our lesson?