Cartoon Potpourri

This will be my last blog post until the new year, so let me leave you with a plethora (look it up) of political cartoons to help tide you over. Whenever you need a cartoon fix over the next couple of weeks, just come back here.

Let’s begin with a man who has made real news this year, probably the most honest man who has worked with the government (at least until he was put before a congressional panel to testify):

Architect

In the Senate, the Democrats gave the terrorists an early Christmas present:

Future Interrogation

And here’s one person’s creative idea on illegal immigration:

Sound Immigration Policy

Just kidding.

Of course, at the center of all things political is this man who has become a legend in his own mind, particularly on Biblical knowledge:

It Does Now

I must also add one for a political party that somehow manages to turn a major win into no advantage whatsoever:

Too Quickly

I have a number of cartoons that deal with the government’s lack of ability to do almost anything effectively:

Urge

Love Govt Work

Functional Government

Finally, I offer the true spirit of the season from our cultural masters:

Faith-Based

May we never succumb to that spirit. May the birth of Christ—and everything that flows from that—be the essence of your Christmas.

A New National Conversation

I’m fighting the temptation to write a blog that lists every action of the Obama administration that manifests scandal, deception, misinformation, racial division, or astounding incompetence, but I don’t have the time to write that long of an article—nor would many readers make it to the end. So I have to break up those incidents into bite-sized pieces.

Let’s just focus for now on the latest manifestations. Jonathan Gruber of Obamacare deception infamy will be testifying before a congressional panel soon. That will put him back in the limelight, which is important, because the public needs to be constantly reminded of what has been foisted upon them. When that happens, I fully expect this type of response from the White House:

Most Transparent Admin

The president’s chief enablers will probably step in at that point, and it will be hard to tell the difference between the White House spin and what the enablers are saying. But if they could be totally honest, we would hear something like this:

Our Job

Also, since Ferguson has been our obsession for the past week and a half, and we’ve made a hero out of a thug/thief, the administration has decided that we once again need a national conversation on race. If I had the authority, I think I would ban the phrase “national conversation on race” indefinitely. Why? The administration’s definition of any such national conversation only goes one way—blaming law enforcement for all the problems. In the past, we’ve had presidents who acted racially—think of Woodrow Wilson, a staunch supporter of segregation who acted it out during his administration—but now the pendulum has swung in the other direction:

Racial Profiling

Translation: guilty until proven innocent, and in our eyes, you are never innocent.

Almost unnoticed while the fallout from Ferguson continues is the new barrier we’ve broken with our national debt. The $18 trillion mark is now in our rearview mirror as we head on to new heights in the next two years. It is now an established fact that the Obama years have added more to the national debt than all other years in our nation’s history combined. Yet the president brushes it off as inconsequential while he seeks to add even more to that total:

How Much

What makes this particularly galling is that while running for president back in 2008, he specifically targeted the debt George Bush contributed, calling it “irresponsible” and a “failure of leadership.” Then, to add to the rhetorical flourish, he said that amassing a debt such as Bush had done was clearly “unpatriotic.”

By your own words, you will be judged.

Might I suggest a new national conversation? How about we talk nationally about the voters’ responsibility to place men and women of honor and integrity in office? For some reason, I doubt the eagerness of the Obama administration to take part in that national conversation.

Identifying the Truly Stupid Voters

I think we’re now at six videos of Jonathan Gruber talking about the stupidity of the American voter and how to pull the wool over their eyes . . . and counting.

Apparently, Prof. Gruber is not a shy individual; he has been broadcasting his views about pulling a fast one with Obamacare for a number of years. So why are we only now hearing about this, when so many videos are available to view? Might it have something to do with the media blackout on the dysfunctional nature of the misnamed Affordable Care Act?

Melissa FrancisMelissa Francis, formerly of CNBC, and now with Fox Business Network, has come forward to tell her tale. She says when Obamacare was being pushed she ran the numbers on it and saw just how phony it all was—it couldn’t really work. She started talking about that on the air—it’s called real reporting—but then was taken to the woodshed by her superiors, who told her that her critique of Obamacare was “disrespecting the office of the presidency.” She had to curtail her honest reporting from that time on. Fortunately for her, she’s now at a network where she can tell the truth to the American people.

Meanwhile, our president, who has a superb track record of throwing people under the bus—Bill Ayers was just someone in his neighborhood; Jeremiah Wright was like the crazy uncle and he never heard him say such things in the twenty years he sat under his teaching—has now tossed Prof. Gruber under the same vehicle.

When questioned about Gruber, the Obama response was one that anyone who has paid any attention to him over the past six years could have guessed ahead of time. You see, he just found out about all this controversy, he hardly even knew Gruber (just by name as he sat around a table with many others), and he was “some adviser” who wasn’t on the president’s staff.

Goodbye, Mr. Gruber, it was nice not really knowing you all that well:

Professor Friend

Ignore, of course, that Gruber was paid nearly $6 million in taxpayer money to be merely “some adviser.” Don’t mention that he was “on loan” at one point by the White House to Congress to spread his wisdom there also. No, don’t pay any attention to those distractions; just believe whatever we tell you:

I'm with Stupid

Yes, many voters were fooled, but they were lied to repeatedly and wanted to trust their governmental leaders. That’s not the same thing as being stupid. If we truly want to tag that label on any voters, how about the ones who didn’t find any problem voting for a law they hadn’t read?

Critical

Now, there is the prime example of outright stupidity. Keep in mind that not even one Republican signed on to this monstrosity. This wasn’t bipartisan stupidity; it’s “owned” by one party only.

The Obamacare Polygraph

A couple days ago I wrote about MIT professor Jonathan Gruber’s arrogant comments about how he helped construct and pass Obamacare, noting that he and others “in the know” deliberately muddled the language of the law to help it pass. The most infamous part of his comments was his putdown of American voters as stupid.

Gruber then went on MSNBC (where he was assured of a friendly hearing) to say he was speaking “off the cuff,” so we shouldn’t take his words seriously. However, shortly after that, because someone was doing some actual investigative reporting, two more videos of Gruber saying nearly identical things surfaced.

If you haven’t heard much about any of this, it’s because you watch network news, which has ignored the story entirely. Yet this is major. It strips away all the pretense about Obamacare and reveals the underhanded way in which it was developed and promoted. In short, it’s all a pack of lies.

Polygraph

This revelation, of course, is hardly a revelation to those of us who have perceived its faulty foundation from the start, and have warned that it’s a huge Ponzi scheme dedicated to the ultimate goal of placing all healthcare in the hands of the government.

The Obama administration has said virtually nothing about this. I imagine the president, if pressed on his need to respond, might have this attitude:

What Do They Know

The sad thing is that he’s probably correct, at least in the case of a certain segment of voters:

Some of the People

Gruber’s attempt to obfuscate in the language of the law helped win the day—along with the usual political shenanigans at the time that assured its passage. Anyone remember the Louisiana Purchase of Sen. Mary Landrieu?

Ironically, the law is heading back to the Supreme Court, with a case that focuses on some of its wording about how only the state exchanges can receive federal subsidies, not the exchanges set up by the federal government. Fewer than twenty states set up exchanges (some of which were complete fiascoes), so all those subsidies being handed out to the other states should be ruled illegal by the Court, if it follows the wording of the law itself.

Stupid Voters

Figuring out the precise wording, though, may be tricky, thanks to Prof. Gruber.

The Obamacare Deception

Jonathan GruberJonathan Gruber. Ever heard of him? He’s now infamous, at least for those who are paying attention to the latest Obamacare development. Gruber is an MIT health economist who was one of the key architects of Obamacare. A video has surfaced from 2013 where he is on a panel discussing the passage of that law. His comments are eye-opening.

First of all, he admits the bill “was written in a tortured way to make sure [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes.” So, it was a tax, but the wording was so convoluted that it would be hard to figure that out. Understand, this is not Gruber bemoaning that fact, but trumpeting it as a “win.”

He continued by saying that the goal was to hide the truth from the American people: “If you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed.”

Well, he’s right about that. But, as Nancy Pelosi, one of the self-proclaimed brilliant minds of the Congress, informed us back then, we needed to pass this bill so we could find out what is in it. Right. That’s how all bills should be passed—vote first, read it later.

Gruber wasn’t done. He then got to the bottom line: “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical for the thing to pass.”

Obamacare LogoThere you have it. The people who designed Obamacare, and those who promoted it, essentially relied upon Americans’ stupidity to make it law. There’s the demeaning aspect of Gruber’s comment—how he and others in this administration view the American public—but there’s also the element of truth in his analysis: the American people can sometimes be terribly stupid and go along with policies intended to destroy them.

Gruber concluded those comments with this: “Look, I wish … we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”

Let me translate: “The ends justify the means.”

Why would Gruber be so open about this? Did he think this would go unnoticed because the American people are so stupid? Is it simply the hubris of the arrogant class that knows what is good for the rest of us and will impose it upon us without our consent?

Regardless, the most transparent administration in history—in theory, not in reality—has just had a bright light shined on its deceptive practices. This is not an isolated incident; it’s the modus operandi for this White House in all things. Think Benghazi, the IRS, the DOJ, the NSA.

If you have been an Obama supporter in any fashion, you have aided in this deception. It’s time to wake up to the truth.

Now, will the mainstream media mention this or will they once again feign ignorance or declare it’s a non-story?

If you want to view this video, I hope you can. According to the account I read, though, it was pulled off YouTube yesterday after the initial furor. The coverup begins.