Now We Know for Sure

I interrupt this analysis of the Bush presidency with a news alert: Obama is on record as favoring the legalization of same-sex marriages. The document can be viewed here:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0109/Obama_backed_samesex_marriage_in_1996.html?showall

While this is not a surprise to me, I offer it for those who have tried to hide behind his rhetoric that he does not favor it. He knew he could not come out in favor and win the presidency, but this document makes it clear what he really believes. Let’s not be fooled. Face up to the reality.

The Bush Presidency: An Analysis (Part II)

Rarely has a president had to face what Bush faced just eight months into his presidency. The only other times that enemies have attacked American soil were in the American Revolution, the War of 1812, and at Pearl Harbor. The 9/11 attacks stunned the nation and called for a determined, forceful response. Bush gave it as he stood on the rubble of the Twin Towers.

He vowed that the people who had perpetrated this terrorism would hear from us soon. Shortly after, he spoke to a joint session of Congress, laying out the case for confronting the evil represented by the 9/11 attacks. And it wasn’t long before the Taliban in Afghanistan were driven from their places of authority.

When Bush then turned to Iraq, his presidency was redefined. Critics called it unnecessary; the far-left accused him of deliberately deceiving the American people with talk of weapons of mass destruction in the country. “Bush lied, people died” was the refrain.

While there can be reasonable disagreements about the wisdom of the Iraq operation, let’s keep a few things in mind:

  • All intelligence agencies in the world agreed that Saddam had a weapons of mass destruction program.
  • Saddam was giving money to the families of suicide bombers, encouraging the fanatics to continue their actions.
  • Iraq had violated all the sanctions laid upon it by the U.N. after the Persian Gulf War and had restricted access for inspectors of its weapons facilities.
  • Some Al-Qaeda members were already in Iraq, and it was in the process of becoming another base of terrorist operations.
  • The removal of Saddam has now led to a government that is an ally of the United States.

Were there problems in execution? Yes. You don’t brag about “Shock and Awe” before going in; neither do you declare “Mission Accomplished” ahead of time. There was too much optimism about how quickly Iraqis would respond to freedom. They are a different culture; they had no history of self-government. And Bush stayed with the Rumsfeld strategy too long. The surge, which he finally approved, did the job.

Government’s primary responsibility is to protect its people. In the last seven years, the terrorists have been unable to repeat their 9/11 success on American soil. That, by itself, is a primary accomplishment of the Bush administration.

The Bush Presidency: An Analysis (Part I)

Last week, I spoke at the Republican Club of Lakeland, providing my analysis of the positives and negatives of the Bush presidency.

I began with a discussion of the 2000 election, which caused so much rancor in the nation. Through all the recounts and challenges, it was clear that George Bush won Florida, and therefore the election. It was a legitimate victory, marred primarily by attempts to overthrow it.

Almost immediately, the media began its attack, treating Bush as a fraudulent president. The Democrats, bitter at being beaten, dug in their heels and attempted to undermine his administration from the very beginning.

Bush wanted to be the president of all the people of America. He had a history of working with Democrats when he was governor of Texas. Yet now, no matter how hard he tried, he was portrayed as a divider, not a uniter. His situation was comparable to a pinch hitter being sent up to bat for someone who already has two strikes against him.

Now, I certainly have criticisms of the Bush presidency, as will be seen in future posts, but the treatment he received at the hands of the opposition party and the media (and some might say there is little difference between the two) was despicable. How was he going to unite the American people under these circumstances?

9/11 provided that opportunity. That will be my next subject.

Big Government: The Answer to All Problems

Obama at George Mason University

Obama at George Mason University

President-elect Obama gave a speech the other day at George Mason University in which he made the following comment:

The majority of Americans’ attitude toward government has changed drastically in recent years. Only government can break the vicious cycles that are crippling our economy — where a lack of spending leads to lost jobs which leads to even less spending.

So now we are at peace with big government because only government can save the economy. Notice also the emphasis on lack of spending. Obama seems to think that the way to bring us out of a recession is to have the government spend more so that people can spend more. Spending one’s way into prosperity? It’s been tried. It was called the New Deal. It didn’t work then, and it won’t work now.

Keep in Mind the Following

With all the talk lately about how “moderate” Obama has become, Christians (as well as other conservatives) should keep this in mind:

He has not changed his mind on these issues, and they form the bedrock of a successful society.

Great Power or Great Responsibility?

So many people want to be president. Perhaps it would do them some good to remember comments by America’s first three presidents.

When Washington was elected to the presidency, he wrote to Henry Knox:

My movements to the chair of Government will be accompanied by feelings not unlike those of a culprit who is going to the place of his execution: so unwilling am I, in the evening of a life nearly consumed in public cares, to quit a peaceful abode for an Ocean of difficulties, without that competency of political skill, abilities and inclination which is necessary to manage the helm.

Washington understood the immense responsibility that would rest upon him.

When John Adams succeeded him eight years later, as he and Washington were leaving the scene of his inauguration, he later wrote:

Methought I heard him think, “Ay! I am fairly out and you are fairly in! See which of us will be the happiest!”

Adams had reason to be concerned. Imagine what it would be like having to be Washington’s successor, having to follow the man considered to be the Father of the Country. Regardless of Adams’s many accomplishments, he didn’t measure up to Washington in the eyes of the nation. Certain congressmen and senators, in a rather direct display of disrespect, even referred to him as “His Rotundity.”

Then there was Jefferson. He added the Louisiana Territory to the country, thus doubling its size. He sent out the Lewis and Clark expedition to see what he had bought. He was reelected easily. Yet, at the end of his second term, when he signed a bill stopping all shipping (in order to avoid a European war), he alienated all of the New England states, which made their living by that very shipping. The historian Paul Johnson comments that Jefferson left office a beaten man. Jefferson said:

Oh for the day when I shall be withdrawn from [office] ; when I shall have leisure to enjoy my family, my friends, my farm and books!

Too many individuals seek what they think will be greater power, only to come to the realization that the responsibilities can be overwhelming. I prefer to entrust power and authority to those who don’t want it so badly. Perhaps they will handle it more wisely.

Expectations

Inauguration day is coming very soon. A word of caution for the media seems appropriate at this time:

For all who voted for this “change,” please do keep that in mind. For those of us who didn’t, support when we can, critique when necessary. Never lose sight of foundational principles and pray that those principles can still be manifested even through someone who doesn’t share them.

One more thing: remember that civil government is not the answer to everything; God works in individuals and other institutions as well. Society is more than the government.

My expectations for the new administration are low. My faith in God remains high.